dlakelan ([info]dlakelan) wrote,
@ 2008-06-19 13:52:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Amazingly bad reporting on gas prices
I'm bored with people honking on high gas prices on the radio and internet and soforth. No-one ever analyzes the data correctly so it's just all sound and fury. Sure it's been going up rapidly, but how big a fraction of people's income is gas cost?

The question led me to produce my own analysis...

You shouldn't deflate gas prices with CPI because CPI has all kinds of screwy relationships with fuel and energy prices. The main question is what fraction of average income is the gas we use?



The graph shows the cost of 500 gallons of gas (a good order of magnitude of the amount we use in a year on short commutes in a decent commuter car) as a fraction of per capita gdp, both in nominal dollars. Spline interpolated.

If you like you can see the data and script used to generate the graph.

Sources revealed:

Population data from wikipedia
GDP from bea.gov
Gas prices from some helpful dude on the internet I'm using his usa average prices..

The round dot is at $4.50 on 6/16/2008, which is close to the local price in LA.

This curve doesn't take into account increases in fuel efficiency, or reduction in pollution (an externality cost not fully included in the dollars/gal). So those effects should make the graph even less dire in some sense.



(Post a new comment)

commuting distance
(Anonymous)
2008-07-05 01:41 am UTC (link)
care to comment on whether "500 gallons of gas (a good order of magnitude of the amount we use in a year on short commutes in a decent commuter car)" has remained equally valid over the last 28 years?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: commuting distance
[info]dlakelan
2008-07-05 04:17 am UTC (link)
As an order of magnitude it is valid. As a more precise estimate, no it probably hasn't. but the effect is twofold, one is changing average commute distance, and the other is changing average fuel efficiency. Fuel efficiency of "decent commuter cars" has fluctuated quite a bit I think as people trade off safety and convenience for efficiency for example. Another effect is that as people get wealthier they tend to move farther from urban centers into the suburbs, so the economic growth of the last 30 years has probably increased the number of people living in outer suburbs.

It's a good point. thanks for bringing it up. If I were doing a research project i would want to look into this effect. But I think it will be a second order one, such as perhaps a factor of 1.25 or so.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: commuting distance
[info]dlakelan
2008-07-05 04:37 am UTC (link)
Also, when prices are low, people will use more, and when prices are high, they will use less... so if anything the effect might be to reduce the variability through time.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Just wanted to say
(Anonymous)
2008-08-03 04:20 pm UTC (link)
Brilliant!

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…